v27 #2 Let’s Get Technical

by | Jun 5, 2015 | 0 comments

Working Together to Move Titles to Off-Site Storage

Column Editors:  Stacey Marien  (Acquisitions Librarian, American University Library)  <smarien@american.edu>

and Alayne Mundt  (Resource Description Librarian, American University Library)  <mundt@american.edu>

In our previous ATG article, “Workflow Collaboration at the American University Library” (v.26#6, Dec. 2014-Jan. 2015), Alayne and I detailed the first time the Acquisitions and Cataloging units at American University Library collaborated on a project.  In this article, we describe how we came together to work on moving over 100,000 volumes to our off-site storage facility.

The Situation

Over the course of the past two years and up to the present, the Technical Services unit has moved over 100,000 volumes from our stacks to our consortium’s (WRLC) off-site storage unit, located about an hour away from the American University campus, in Upper Marlboro, Maryland.  The moving of all these volumes was done in order to create more study space for students in the library.  Before the massive relocation occurred, there had been a small-scale weeding project involving the science librarian and the librarian responsible for collecting in philosophy and religion.  This small weeding project took place a couple of years before the big push to move low-use books offsite.  Both those librarians identified titles to be moved and asked their respective faculty to review the titles.  Cataloging handled all of the technical aspects of that project.

There are three ways that the bulk of the titles are being identified and diverted to cataloging in order to be moved off-site.  Since the timeframe was tight and we had no formal weeding policy, a quick and dirty criterion is being used to pull the volumes. If the publication date was 1980 or earlier and had no circulation statistics since 1998 (when our library implemented the Voyager system), the title is pulled.  The head of Circulation runs the title lists for the student workers to locate the books.  He excludes any titles that are charged to administrative accounts, such as processing and repair.  The student workers take the titles off the shelves and put them in an area in Technical Services for the Cataloging and Acquisitions staff to review.  The process of identifying the titles is more complicated than just running a report as we are dealing with many multi-volume sets.  Certain criteria are set up in evaluating the multi-volume sets, and it is complicated enough to warrant a separate article.

The second way the titles are identified for weeding is to evaluate the books that are damaged and routed to Acquisitions from the Circulation Department.  The Circulation staff has loose criteria to identify damaged books.  If a book is checked out with damage, a note is made in the circulation record so that when it is returned, the book is placed on a cart for the processing unit.  When the books are returned, they are also examined for obvious damage.  The books can also be identified when the student workers are in the stacks doing tasks such as shifting or shelving.  The number of damaged books spike at the end of the semester.  The cart of damaged books is then given to Processing, and a form is filled out for the Collection Managers to review.  A decision can be made for the book to be replaced and moved to off-site storage or to just be sent without being replaced.

The third and final way titles are identified to be moved is from a one-time dismantling of our reference collection.  Decisions are made by the Collection Managers about retaining reference titles that would then be moved to the stacks or would be moved to off-site storage.

The LogisticComments 0s

Once the books slated to be sent to off-site storage are staged for cataloging work to be done, they are placed on shelving in Technical Services.  Cataloging student workers have been trained by Circulation staff to pull books, so they are able to work on all aspects of the move to storage workflow:  pulling, staging, database work, and boxing.  This has ensured that there is always work for students to do and there is no downtime due to delays in pulling from Circulation.  Cataloging staff, student workers, and Acquisitions staff involved in the move-to-storage project, pull books to be worked on from the staging shelves.  There is no proscribed order for working on books, so titles can be pulled at random.  Cataloging has developed two sets of procedures for books being moved to storage.  One procedure is for single-volume books, which is primarily used by student workers, and the other procedure is for more complex problem resolution and multivolume sets.  This is because the location change procedures for the two categories of materials are treated differently in the catalog.

Instructions for working on books being sent to storage include:

  • Looking the books up by call number to ensure that the book in hand matches the corresponding bibliographic record.
  • Checking that multiple date elements in the record match each other and the book in hand.
  • The ISBN.
  • Pagination.
  • Title statement matches the book in hand.
  • Publishing statement matches the book in hand.
  • Location code.
  • Barcode matches the book in hand.

If any of these elements do not match or are incorrect and they are being worked on by students, the books are set aside for full-time staff to correct.

Students have been trained to scan the barcode and create an item record for monographs that did not have them, and to change the location code to identify them as a book that will be stored in the off-site storage facility.  They place any books that have incorrect elements or other problems in a special shelving unit for full-time staff to correct.

Because multivolume sets are more complicated and need to be treated differently in the catalog because of display issues, work on them is reserved for full-time staff.  The same bibliographic elements are checked as for single volumes, in addition to:

  • Certain fixed field elements.
  • Holdings statement in the holdings record matches what we actually have.
  • Individual volume information in the item record is correct.
  • Additionally, we add a note into the holdings record that displays in the catalog to indicate that the books are held at storage and can be requested through our consortium loan service.

The Acquisitions unit has been able to contribute significantly to this project over time.  All Acquisitions staff members have been trained on the move to storage workflow.  One Acquisitions Specialist has been trained on more complex elements of the project, and has taken on some problem resolution as well as oversight of Acquisitions student workers contributing to the project.

Additionally, our Processing Department, which is located within the Acquisitions Unit, has played a large role in this ongoing project by being able to evaluate books slated to be moved to off-site storage for damage or mold, and replacing or repairing books as necessary.  The Processing and Serials Specialist has trained Cataloging Staff and student workers to evaluate books and route them to her for triage, as well as to isolate any books that have mold.

After performing the check of bibliographic elements and changing the location code, books are reshelved in the staging area on their spine.  This signals to student workers that these books are ready for boxing to be sent to the off-site storage facility.  Students track the number of books boxed on a spreadsheet so that we can report to our administrative office the number of volumes being sent, since we are charged by our consortia’s main office for relocating them to the off-site storage facility.  Our consortia office sends a truck to pick up the boxed books once a month.

The Results

Since the move to storage project began in June 2012, we have relocated approximately 102,000 volumes to off-site storage, freeing up student study space within the library.  The secondary benefit to the project has been cleanup of records and ensuring that books match the record they are attached to before sending them to off-site storage.  This is in addition to evaluating the books conditions and having the opportunity to repair or replace damaged or moldy materials.

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

LATEST NEWS

ATG Conferences, Meetings and Webinars 10/26/20

ATG Conferences, Meetings and Webinars 10/26/20 NISO Plus 2021 Call For Session Proposals! You probably know by now that NISO Plus 2021 will be a global, virtual-first event. What you may not know is that, unlike the inaugural conference in February 2020, next...

ATG Conferences, Meetings and Webinars 10/26/20

ATG Conferences, Meetings and Webinars 10/26/20 NISO Plus 2021 Call For Session Proposals! You probably know by now that NISO Plus 2021 will be a global, virtual-first event. What you may not know is that, unlike the inaugural conference in February 2020, next...

ATG News You Need to Start the Week: 10/26/20

ATG News You Need to Start the Week: 10/26/20 Expanded access to JSTOR and Artstor extended through June 2021 According to Library Technology Guides "As the COVID-19 crisis continues to disrupt higher education, ITHAKA is extending the JSTOR and Artstor expanded...

ATG News & Announcements 10/23/20

- ATG News & Announcements 10/23/20 - Initiative for Open Abstracts According to this announcement the Initiative for Open Abstracts "is a collaboration between scholarly publishers, infrastructure organizations, librarians, researchers and other interested...

ATG Conferences, Meetings, & Webinars 10/22/20

Don’t Forget! Apply for ACRL 2021 Virtual Conference Scholarships by October 23 The deadline to apply for a scholarship to attend the ACRL 2021 Virtual Conference is coming up this Friday, October 23.  REGISTER The ACRL 2021 Scholarship program provides...

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST

Share This