Column Editor: Laura N. Gasaway (Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Law, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; Phone: 919-962-2295; Fax: 919-962-1193)
QUESTION: A liberal arts college is being asked to put digital copies of student theses on a server. If the theses contain copyrighted images, standardized tests, etc., is permission needed? Or should access be by password only? Is there any disclaimer that the college should use if the theses are posted on the Web?
ANSWER: Whether the theses are available on the open Web or on a password protected site makes considerable difference in this situation. In the print world, for published theses and dissertations, clearly student authors were required by the publisher to get permission to include copyrighted photographs and other materials. When the thesis or dissertation was only in the library collection, seldom did the student seek permission for incorporating copyrighted material since the thesis was not going to be published. Posting on the Web, however, is a type of publication with one difference — the college is the publisher, and a copyright holder is more likely to blame the college rather than the individual student for any infringement. Making the theses available on a password protected Website is more akin to having the printed theses available only in the library. However, students and others who have the password can access the images and can download them, so the college should make some effort to discourage downloading should be made.
While a disclaimer on the Web might make college officials feel better, it is unlikely to have any legal effect. On the other hand, a notice on a password protected site that users may not download images from the theses would be useful to alert them that downloading is not permitted and would show efforts to discourage infringement by users.
If the college decides that it does want to put theses on the Web, then student authors should be charged with responsibility for seeking permission for the use of copyrighted images.
QUESTION: A University professor wants to use his own personal Netflix streaming account to show an entire documentary in a face to face class? Can he do this or show part of the documentary in class? The Netflix Website contains the following language:
ANSWER: According to this agreement, the answer is no. This is the license agreement for personal use with Netflix. Even if the school owned a copy of the documentary, it would take permission from the copyright owner to stream the entire film to a class.
Under section 110(2) of the Copyright Act [the TEACH Act] nonprofit educational institutions can stream reasonable and limited portions of films without permission, but only by following the stringent provisions of the Act. For example, only students enrolled in a particular course can view the transmission of the film, the school must take reasonable efforts to prevent downloading, etc.
To transmit (stream) the entire documentary, the institution must have permission and likely pay some permission fees. This applies whether it is truly for distance learning or is just a transmitted portion of a face-to-face course (which is what streaming is). If the professor wants to use the documentary from Netflix, he or she should contact Netflix and seek permission.
QUESTION: In 1969, the student photography editor for the university newspaper took a photographed a student sit-in that appeared in the student paper with “Photo by XXX” under the picture. The original photograph eventually was donated to the library by the publications department. It was not marked by the student with a copyright notice or any attribution. The photograph has been presumed to be university property and was reprinted in a book celebrating the institution’s sesquicentennial a few years ago. Since then, the student has become a professional photographer and sought money from the school for reprinting the image which it thought it owned. In order to make the threat go away, the publicity department wants to promise the photographer that it or any similar photo will be marked on the back with the line “Copyright 1969 XXX XXXX Photography, contact 555-555-5555 (CLASS OF 1970).” Were student newspaper contents and photos owned by individual students or the college in 1969?
ANSWER: Under the law, the student photographer would own the copyright unless there is some agreement with the student newspaper that the newspaper itself or the university owns the copyright. If the photography editor position was a paid position (some student newspaper positions usually do have a stipend), then the photograph is a work-for-hire and the university owns the copyright. Note that some student newspapers are separate incorporated entities, and these newspapers, rather than the university, would may own the copyright.
QUESTION: Is free clip art considered to be public domain documents? What is expected of writers when they use clip art from Microsoft programs?
ANSWER: Free clip art is copyrighted just like everything else. “Free” just means that there is no charge for using it, not that it is free from copyright protection. Public domain means that there is no copyright at all, but this is not the case for clip art.
The question about Microsoft clip art is governed by its license agreement which anyone using the clip art should read. Companies that offer clip art under a license agreement intend that it be used within the terms of the agreement.
Leah was appointed Executive Director of the Charleston Conference in 2017, and has served in various roles with the Charleston Information Group, LLC, since 2004. Prior to working for the conference, she was Assistant Director of Graduate Admissions for the College of Charleston for four years. She lives in a small town near Columbia, SC, with her husband and two kids where they raise a menagerie of farm animals.